Artikel
Analysis of different influences on the intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring of Brodman Area 4 using compound muscle action potentials
Analyse verschiedener Einflussfaktoren auf das intraoperative neurophysiologische Monitoring der Brodman Area 4 mit Hilfe von evozierten Muskelaktionspotentialen
Suche in Medline nach
Autoren
Veröffentlicht: | 23. April 2004 |
---|
Gliederung
Text
Objective
Brain tumor surgery is limited by the risk of postoperative neurological deficits. Intraoperative neurophysiological examination techniques, which are based on the electrical excitability of the human brain cortex, are thus still indispensable for surgery in eloquent areas such as the primary motor cortex (Brodman Area 4).
Methods
This study examined the data obtained from a total of 106 cerebral interventions for lesions with direct contact to and another 115 immediately adjacent to Brodman Area 4 in order to search for direct connections between intraoperative potential changes and specific surgical maneuvers or other non-surgical influences when using monopolar cortex stimulation (MCS) for continuous intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.
Results
Compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) were recorded from the thenar muscles and forearm flexors in accordance with the large representational area of the hand and forearm in Brodman Area 4. Statistical analysis of the parameters: latency, potential width and amplitude showed spontaneous latency prolongations or abrupt amplitude reductions as a reliable warning signal for direct involvement of the motor cortex or motor pathways. Various potential changes and their direct correlation to particular surgical techniques and different non-surgical reasons were found.
Conclusions
Like other intraoperative neurophysiological examination techniques, MCS has technical, anatomical and neurophysiological limitations. MCS must be considered a stimulation technique that enables reliable qualitative analysis of the recorded potentials and may thus be regarded as directly predictive. Nevertheless, a variety of surgical and non-surgical influences can cause positive or false negative results.