Artikel
Complication and infection risk using bone substitute materials to treat long bone defects in geriatric patients: An observational study
Suche in Medline nach
Autoren
-
Jonas Pawelke
- Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Gießen, Germany
-
Vithusha Vinayahalingam
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Gießen, Germany
-
Thaqif Elkhassawna
- Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Klinik für Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Labor für Experimentelle Unfallchirurgie, Gießen, Germany
-
Christian Heiß
- Uniklinikum Gießen, Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Gießen, Germany
-
Larissa Eckl
- Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
-
Gero Knapp
- Uniklinikum Gießen, Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Gießen, Germany
| Veröffentlicht: | 23. Oktober 2023 |
|---|
Gliederung
Text
Objectives: The treatment of large bone defects in geriatric patients often presents a major surgical challenge because of age-related bone loss. In such patients, the scarcity of healthy makes autologous grafting techniques hard to perform. On the one hand, clinicians' fear of possible infections limits using bone substitute materials (BSM). On the other hand, BSM is limitless and spares patients another surgery to harvest autologous material
Methods: To address the aptness of BSM in geriatric patients, we performed a retrospective analysis of all patients over the age of 64 years who visited our clinic between the years 2011–2018. The study assessed postoperative complications clinically and healing results radiologically. The study included 83 patients with bone defects at the distal radius, proximal humerus, and proximal tibia. The defect zones were filled with BSM based on either nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (NHA) or calcium phosphate (CP). For comparison, a reference group (empty defect, ED) without the void filling with a BSM was also included
Results and conclusion: 106 patients sustained traumatic fractures of the distal radius (71.7%), proximal humerus (5.7%), and proximal tibia (22.6%). No difference was found between the BSM groups in infection occurrence (p=1.0). Although not statistically significant, the BSM groups showed a lower rate of pseudarthrosis (p=0.09) compared with the ED group. Relative risk (RR) of complications was 32.64% less in the BSM groups compared with the ED group. The additional beneficial outcome of BSM was demonstrated by calculating the number needed to treat (NNT). The calculation showed that with every six patients treated, at least one complication could be avoided. Radiological assessment of bone healing showed significant improvement in the bridging of the defect zone (p<0.001) when BSM was used.
In contrast to previous studies, the study showed that BSM could support bone healing and does not present an infection risk in geriatric patients. The NNT calculation indicates a wider potential benefit of BSM.
