gms | German Medical Science

17. Internationales SkillsLab Symposium 2023

16.03. - 18.03.2023, Köln

Impact of clinical simulation with a theoretical introduction on theoretical knowledge of students

Meeting Abstract

  • corresponding author Rok Arh - University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Slowenien
  • Lucija Jazbec - University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Slowenien
  • presenting/speaker Žiga Mrak - University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Slowenien
  • presenting/speaker Lara Sonjak - University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Slowenien
  • Luka Varda - University Medical Centre Maribor, Clinic for Internal Medicine, Slowenien
  • Tadej Petreski - University Medical Centre Maribor, Clinic for Internal Medicine, Slowenien
  • Sebastjan Bevc - University Medical Centre Maribor, Clinic for Internal Medicine, Slowenien

17. Internationales SkillsLab Symposium 2023. Köln, 16.-18.03.2023. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2024. DocV3-1

doi: 10.3205/23isls15, urn:nbn:de:0183-23isls151

Veröffentlicht: 15. Januar 2024

© 2024 Arh et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Background: In the framework of the peer tutoring project at the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Maribor we have been trying to find creative ways of learning with the greatest possible efficiency. We have conducted a study to determine the effectiveness of simulation-based learning of sepsis and ABCDE approach.

Summary of work: Our research included 52 students of general medicine from both Slovenian medical faculties. The students were randomly allocated to two different groups – the first group has taken a theoretical exam before clinical simulation with a theoretical introduction and the second one immediately after it. The theoretical introduction included ABCDE approach basics, and the simulation was a practical clinical case with a patient in septic shock. The exam consisted of 20 multiple choice questions with one correct answer about sepsis, septic shock, and ABCDE approach.

Summary of results: Data analysis showed better results in the group which took the exam after participating in the simulation. There was no statistically significant difference between both faculties or study year.

Discussion and conclusion: Our work showed that clinical simulation with theoretical introduction can significantly improve the results on theoretical exams representing better short-term knowledge. Further research and an exam after a longer period of time should be performed in order to better evaluate the impact of both on knowledge retention.

Take-home messages: Clinical simulation with a theoretical introduction can not only make studying more interesting for students, but positively influence their theoretical knowledge.